The Irving Entry

NamUs MP100022 identifies Aaron Demarcus McMorris, missing age 31, and lists Irving, Texas, ZIP code 75039, in Dallas County. Its Date of Last Contact is October 13, 2022. The brief circumstances statement also says he was last seen in Irving on that date.¹

The record provides a city and date rather than a scene. It does not give an observation time, a last-contact street address, a planned destination, or the identity of an observer. The ZIP code is location context, not a precise point from which to draw a route.

Contact and Reporting Are Separate

The investigating-agency section gives October 18, 2022 as Date Reported. The circumstances section labels February 7, 2023 as NamUs Case Created, while the reader separately displays a page-level Date Created of May 7, 2026.¹

Each date should remain attached to its label. The October 18 field is not another sighting, and the database dates do not establish when concern first arose. The reviewed source does not explain the interval between the last-contact and reporting fields or the separate creation dates.

The Agency Reference

NamUs names Irving Police Department, agency case 22-25761, and telephone (972) 273-1010.¹ That case number helps distinguish this record from unrelated people with similar names.

The police office address belongs to the agency’s contact information. It does not supply the missing last-seen address. A fuller chronology would require an attributable account of the encounter and subsequent events, not a substitution of administrative details for missing circumstances.

Sourced Accounts and Questions

NamUs gives October 13, 2022 for contact in Irving and October 18 for the agency report, followed by separate database dates.¹ The reviewed entry does not establish competing accounts; it leaves the actual contact undescribed beyond a city and date.

Can you find a dated agency statement explaining the time, place and basis of the October 13 contact? A publicly documented account could clarify what was observed or reported. The Irving ZIP code and police office address cannot supply an omitted last-contact point.

When you compare a later notice, can you distinguish a documented new contact from a repetition of the original entry? Match MP100022 and Irving case 22-25761, and keep the event date separate from the publication date. The interval before the report does not explain itself.

Here’s where you come in: explore these open questions in your own Research File in Almost Solved. Start with the October contact and the separately labelled report, adding only the details each attributable source supports. Leave an explanation for the intervening period open unless evidence establishes it.

Conclusion

The public entry supports a traceable Irving record with distinct contact, report and database dates. Its brevity is itself a limit on the history that can be written. Preserving those few anchors accurately leaves room for later evidence without inventing what the record does not say.