The July 2002 Entry

NamUs MP151634 records Mangattuparambil’s age at disappearance as 29 and his last-contact date as July 21, 2002. It identifies Brevard County, Florida in the location fields, while the circumstances entry gives an unknown location.¹

The county is therefore a geographic reference in the record, not a documented street-level observation. The reviewed entry does not establish a witness, a time of day, an intended destination or a journey.

Three Different Record Dates

The investigating-agency section gives July 21, 2002 as the report date. Although that date matches the last-contact field, a report and a last contact describe different events. The public entry does not explain their sequence within the day.¹

NamUs gives October 23, 2025 as the case-creation date; the public reader separately displays May 7, 2026 as its creation date.¹ Those later administrative dates should not replace the 2002 contact date or be treated as new sightings.

Name Variants and the Agency Reference

The entry lists four aliases: Abdul Nishad Mangattupparambil, Rahiman Nishad Mangattuparanbil, Abdul Rahiman Mangattuparanbil and Abdul Nishad Mangattuparanbil.¹ Their spellings can help match a later reference, but a similar name alone does not establish that another document concerns this person.

Brevard County Sheriff’s Office is the named investigating agency, with case 02-195906 and telephone (321) 633-8419.¹ Its Titusville office address is an agency contact location; it is not evidence that Mangattuparambil was last observed there.

Sourced Accounts and Questions

NamUs records Brevard County in its geographic fields while describing the precise location as unknown. It also gives July 21, 2002 for both contact and report, followed by much later database-creation dates.¹ These are differences in detail and record function, not established conflicting recollections.

Can you find a dated agency statement clarifying what contact occurred on July 21, 2002 and where? A publicly released account explaining the event behind that field could narrow the unknown location; the agency’s Titusville office address cannot do so.

When you compare another record using one of the listed name variants, can you match it to MP151634 or Brevard County case 02-195906? Keep any unmatched reference separate. A source explicitly linking the identity and event would be needed before extending the chronology.

Explore these questions in a Research File in Almost Solved. Start with the 2002 contact and attach any attributable clarification to that event. Keep administrative dates, source dates and your own interpretation distinct, so a later entry does not become an invented sighting.

Conclusion

The usable foundation is a July 2002 contact and report date, a county-level reference, recorded name variants and an agency case number. The circumstances remain sparse. A fuller narrative requires additional attributable evidence rather than deductions from the person’s name, the office address or the later database dates.