The Immokalee Entry

NamUs MP110530 identifies Perez-Hernandez as male and 15 at disappearance. It gives September 27, 2022 as Date of Last Contact and lists Immokalee, Florida, in Collier County. The circumstances text repeats the last-seen date but does not identify a time, observer, companion, or destination.¹

The locality field does not establish an exact observation site. The investigating agency’s Naples office is a contact address, not evidence that the last contact occurred there.

An Unavailable Physical Description

The narrative expressly states that no physical description is available. Hair and eye color are displayed as unknown, and no clothing details are entered.¹ The profile’s numerical height and weight fields do not provide a usable description alongside that statement. This paper does not repeat those figures as identification measurements or estimate missing details from an image.

Contact and Reporting Are Separate

The agency entry lists August 15, 2023 as Date Reported. NamUs Case Created is October 25, 2023; the surrounding webpage separately displays May 7, 2026 under Date Created.¹

These entries retain their distinct roles. The interval after the September 2022 contact field does not establish a reason for the timing of a report or when every earlier concern was raised. The later database and webpage dates are not later observations.

The Case Reference

NamUs lists Collier County Sheriff’s Office, agency case 23-319491, and telephone (239) 252-9300.¹ These references help distinguish this matter from similarly named people. They are the contact information displayed at review, not independent confirmation of current whereabouts.

Sourced Accounts and Questions

The public narrative provides a last-seen date and explicitly lacks a physical description.¹ It does not establish conflicting witness accounts. The important gaps concern the underlying observation and a usable identification record.

Can you find a public agency notice clarifying what contact occurred on September 27? A statement identifying the event and its time or location context could add detail without inventing a departure or destination.

When you compare an identification notice, can you match MP110530 and Collier County case 23-319491 before relying on its description? An attributable agency clarification would be needed to supply usable measurements or reconcile numerical fields; guessing would create information the source does not support.

Here’s where you come in: explore these open questions in your own Research File in Almost Solved. Keep the contact, report, and record-creation dates separately labelled, and save documented clarifications alongside your notes. Relevant information belongs with investigators.

Conclusion

The record supports an identity, a labelled contact date, and an agency reference. Its sparse circumstances and unavailable physical description limit further reconstruction. Those limits remain visible so that a later attributable update can add information without inheriting invented details.