The Published Last-Seen Statement

California DOJ gives February 1, 1994 under Missing Since and repeats that day in its last-seen statement for Apodaco.¹ The statement does not identify a time, observer, exact location, companion, or destination. A precise calendar date therefore remains a limited chronological anchor, not a reconstructed departure.

The Clothing and Physical Description

The profile describes a black Harley Davidson shirt, blue Levi jeans, athletic shoes, and a black leather vest. It lists black hair, brown eyes, height five feet seven inches, and weight 180 pounds.¹ These are the state profile’s identification details, not an independent examination.

A clothing brand or vest cannot establish a motorcycle journey, group affiliation, motive, or explanation. Those would be additional claims requiring their own sources. This study does not infer them from the outfit.

The Sacramento Agency Reference

The contact block names Sacramento Police Department, telephone (916) 808-0621, and case 95-20994.¹ The agency name does not independently establish the exact place of the last observation. The case number is retained as an identifier, not decoded into a report date.

The profile’s accessibility at review does not establish when its underlying description was last revised. No later contact or outcome can be inferred solely from its presence on a public website.

Sourced Accounts and Questions

The reviewed state profile supplies a last-seen date, description, and agency reference, but no detailed observation narrative.¹ It does not establish competing witness accounts. The open questions concern the circumstances behind that brief statement.

Can you find a public agency account identifying the observation behind February 1? A dated, attributable description of the time and location context could make the chronology more useful. The reporting agency’s name alone cannot fill that gap.

When you compare a later account, can you match the full name and case 95-20994 before treating its events as part of this file? Note whether it supplies a new observation or simply repeats the identification profile. A similarly named person or an assumed meaning of the case number is not enough.

Here’s where you come in: explore these open questions in your own Research File in Almost Solved. Save the source and any attributable clarification alongside your notes, leaving unreported movements and circumstances open. Relevant information belongs with investigators.

Conclusion

The California record provides a dated last-seen reference and a way to match further information to the correct file. Its brevity limits reconstruction. Keeping the observation question separate from clothing and agency metadata preserves the record’s usefulness without inventing a story.