The Shared Day and Agency Contact

NamUs MP159386 gives December 11, 2025 under Date of Last Contact and says Lee was last seen in Houston, Texas. NCMEC poster 2091338 lists December 11, 2025 under Missing Since and repeats that day in its brief last-seen statement.^1,2

The notices share the full name and Houston Police Department telephone (832) 394-1840.^1,2 Those details support a comparison of the named notices. NamUs’s NCMEC Number field is unfilled, so this paper does not describe an explicit database cross-reference that the entry does not provide.

Houston and Humble as Source Labels

NamUs lists Houston, Texas, postal code 77396, and Harris County; its narrative also uses Houston. The NCMEC poster displays Humble, Texas.^1,2 Neither reviewed narrative identifies an exact observation site, time, observer, companion, vehicle, or destination.

The different locality labels do not establish two observations or travel between the places. They could only become a documented sequence if an attributable source identifies separate events. This study does not choose an exact site from a broad locality or map reference.

Age Fields and Identification

At review, NamUs displays 16 under both Missing Age and Current Age; NCMEC displays 17 under Age Now. Both identify Lee as male.^1,2 These labels describe different reference points, and the profiles do not provide an explanation of their update timing. This paper preserves the displayed values without calculating or asserting a corrected present age.

NamUs lists black hair, brown eyes, height six feet, and weight 150 pounds. Its clothing section has no entered information.¹ The NCMEC poster’s short text does not add a detailed last-seen circumstances narrative.² No departure from home, organized search event, or press conference is established by these reviewed notices.

The Later Administrative Dates

NamUs gives December 15, 2025 as the agency Date Reported and June 9, 2026 as NamUs Case Created. The surrounding webpage displays June 12, 2026 under Date Created. Its agency case reference is 1632201-25.¹

These later dates do not establish later contact. The agency-report field alone does not explain when every earlier concern was communicated. NCMEC number 2091338 and the NamUs and police identifiers should remain labelled by their issuing source.^1,2 Relevant information belongs with investigators, rather than only in private research notes.

Sourced Accounts and Questions

The notices share a day and police contact but present different locality labels and age-field values.^1,2 These are differences in public records, not established disagreements between witnesses. The reviewed accounts do not supply the detailed observations needed to explain them.

Can you find a public agency clarification of the locality behind the December 11 account? A statement identifying the observation site and context could explain how Houston and Humble are being used without turning the names into a travel route.

When you compare an age description or later notice, can you record its source, date, and whether it refers to age at disappearance or age at publication? A dated clarification matched to these identifiers would be more useful than silently replacing one displayed value with another.

Here’s where you come in: explore these source questions in your own Research File in Almost Solved. Keep the two locality descriptions, age labels, and administrative history distinct as you save links and notes. Leave undocumented movements and explanations open; provide relevant information to investigators.

Conclusion

The notices provide a shared date and reporting channel but a limited event account. Their differences are useful questions for further source checking. Keeping the original labels visible avoids creating a journey or later observation that neither notice documents.