Albert Leo Jimenez: The San Francisco Record
Two official entries preserve the date and distinctive identification details without a fuller account.
Abstract
NamUs MP37759 lists March 19, 1981 as Albert Leo Jimenez’s Date of Last Contact, with San Francisco, California as Missing From. California’s Department of Justice also says he was last seen in San Francisco that day.1,2 Neither reviewed narrative identifies an observer, exact site, or time.
The March 19 Record
NamUs’s short account repeats the date without describing the event. California’s narrative adds the city.1,2 Agreement between these entries is useful for matching the file, but the underlying information may be shared; the pages do not establish two independently documented observations.
Distinctive Identification Details
Both records list black hair, brown eyes, height 5 feet 10 inches, and weight 157 pounds. NamUs gives missing age 54. California lists birth date August 7, 1926.1,2 These age and birth-date labels are kept as published rather than converted into a claim about his current circumstances.
NamUs describes a cast on the right leg from knee to ankle and braces on his teeth. California also describes the cast and adds three metal pins in the tibia and fibula, with braces at the time he went missing.1,2 These identification details do not explain an injury’s cause, establish mobility, or document a route. NamUs has no clothing information entered.
File References and Administrative Dates
NamUs lists San Francisco Police Department case 81-1333315 and phone (415) 553-0123; California displays 811333315 and (415) 553-1071.1,2 Preserve each source’s formatting and contact number rather than silently replacing one. NamUs has no report date entered. Its Case Created field is April 8, 2017, and the webpage Date Created label is July 6, 2026.1 These dates are not later contacts.
Sourced Accounts and Questions
Here’s where you come in. Can you find an attributable agency account tied to these file references that explains the March 19 observation—who saw Jimenez, where, and when?1,2 An underlying report or dated statement could supply the event that the short public narratives leave undescribed.
As you compare identification records, can you keep the cast, braces, and source dates together without inferring how he traveled?1,2 Record the document’s actual claim and remaining uncertainty in a Research File in Almost Solved. Physical identifiers help match records; they do not explain the disappearance.
Scope and Method
The underlying police report, witness statements, and medical or dental records were not independently reviewed. No case-specific original news account was located in the focused search. Unmatched results are excluded.
Prepared with AI assistance. Sources and references checked against the cited public materials. This paper is an original synthesis of the identified public sources; it does not reproduce article bodies, transcripts, or an investigative file.
Footnote References
- National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), Missing Person MP37759, Albert Leo Jimenez; San Francisco Police Department case 81-1333315; case-created field April 8, 2017; webpage Date Created July 6, 2026; reviewed November 1, 2026.
- California Department of Justice, Missing Persons, “Albert Leo Jimenez,” case 811333315; Missing Since March 19, 1981; reviewed November 1, 2026.