The NamUs Account

The place field says San Diego, while the narrative says Angel was last known to be in Rosarito, Mexico. The entry does not connect those descriptions into a documented journey.¹

Its San Diego Police Department entry supplies neither a case number nor a report date. Those blanks do not establish that no report exists.¹

The California Profile

California DOJ uses Angel Nieves Estrada and explicitly lists Angel Ignacio Estrada as an alternate name. This published cross-reference supports comparing the records without relying on name resemblance alone.²

The profile gives July 24, 2022 as its last-seen/contact date and San Diego Police reference 22500713A. Its description includes Nieves and Arabic-letter tattoos on the back.²

The date fields differ by one day. Neither retrieved entry supplies an original observation explaining that difference.¹²

Sourced Accounts and Questions

Here’s where you come in. Can you locate the original July 23 account and identify what event its date describes?¹

Can you establish what the Rosarito narrative describes before treating it as a dated stop?¹

Can you identify the documented event supporting July 24, keeping its source attached to each timeline note?²

Can you use the agency reference and published alternate name when matching a new record, rather than merging every Angel Estrada result?²

Keep the dated records and your questions in a Research File in Almost Solved. Preserve each source’s name, date label and place wording. That gives you a way to compare a new document without filling the space between two entries with an assumed route.