Arisoneide Gosselin: The Last Contact in Turlock
A daughter’s recollection, an afternoon account and the limits of the record.
Abstract
California DOJ and NamUs MP22110 list May 28, 1992 for Arisoneide Oliveira Gosselin in Turlock, under police case 9206077.1,2
The Afternoon Account
NamUs attributes a 2 p.m. observation to a friend, who reportedly saw Arisoneide driving near her home. It then describes the locked house and her car in the garage, with personal belongings still inside.2
The record does not reproduce the original statement or document who returned the car. The presence of a vehicle and belongings should not become an assumed observation of the person.
California’s entry supplies the same date and police reference, with a brief Turlock last-seen description. It does not provide a fuller sequence of events.1
The Daughter’s Recollection
In Sabra Stafford’s March 12, 2010 Turlock Journal report, Aline Gosselin recalls saying goodbye before school at nine, then returning that evening to a locked home and her mother’s absence.3
Aline also remembered her mother decorating her room with ballerinas and warming her clothes before school. These everyday recollections preserve the person at the center of the family’s unanswered questions.3
Her interview records a daughter’s retrospective account. It belongs beside the separately attributed afternoon observation, with the source and interview date retained. The two descriptions need original statements before their timing can be fully compared.
Sourced Accounts and Questions
Here’s where you come in. Can you obtain the original statement behind the reported 2 p.m. observation?2
Can you clarify which dated records document the vehicle’s location and the person’s last observed contact?2
Can you distinguish Aline’s 2010 interview from the observations and records created in 1992?3
Keep the source, speaker, event time and open question together in a Research File in Almost Solved. Preserve a distinction even when the record cannot yet explain it. A missing interval does not identify what happened or who was responsible.
Show later developments and reported outcomes
The Dated Investigative Assessment
Stafford’s 2010 report quotes Detective Brandon Bertram describing the disappearance as suspicious and discussing limited physical evidence. Those are dated investigative assessments, not proof of a particular crime or a finding against anyone.3
The reviewed sources do not establish Arisoneide’s fate. Original witness statements, vehicle records and the complete investigative file were not inspected.
Scope and Method
Original witness statements, vehicle records and complete investigative files were not inspected.
Prepared with AI assistance. Sources and references checked against the cited public materials. This paper is an original synthesis of the identified public sources; it does not reproduce article bodies, transcripts, or an investigative file.
Footnote References
- California DOJ, Arisoneide Oliveira Gosselin; reviewed November 3, 2026.
- NamUs MP22110; reviewed November 3, 2026.
- Sabra Stafford, Turlock Journal, March 12, 2010.