Morgan Chauntel Nick: The Alma Record
A child’s evening at a ballfield and the long work that followed.
Abstract
NamUs MP1490 lists June 9, 1995 as Morgan Chauntel Nick’s Date of Last Contact in Alma, Arkansas. She was six.1
An Evening at the Ballfield
KAIT’s June 2025 retrospective describes Morgan and other children catching fireflies near an Alma ballfield. The other children returned; Morgan did not. It recalls a childhood evening interrupted, rather than providing a complete reconstruction of her movements.2
Reading the Official Entry
NamUs identifies Alma Police case 950609-3 and NCMEC 805103. Its narrative gives 10:45 p.m. as the abduction time. The original witness statements behind that published time were not inspected.1
Sourced Accounts and Questions
Here’s where you come in. Can you identify the original observation supporting the published 10:45 p.m. time?1
Can you distinguish a reported forensic link from documentation establishing Morgan’s location or fate?2
Can you separate family-support work and recoveries in other cases from a resolution of Morgan’s case?3
Keep each source, speaker, event date and open question in a Research File in Almost Solved. A record needs its original context before it can answer a larger question.
Show later developments and reported outcomes
Later Reporting and Family Advocacy
KAIT’s retrospective describes a 2024 police announcement about DNA from a pickup, linking a person to the investigation. This is reported investigative assessment; the article does not establish Morgan’s location or fate.2
The 2025 text of Arkansas House Resolution 1063 recognizes Colleen Nick and the Morgan Nick Foundation. It dates the foundation’s formation to 1996 and describes work with Arkansas State Police and support for other families.3
That document records recognition and advocacy work. It does not report Morgan’s recovery.3
Original laboratory reports, witness statements and the complete investigative file were not inspected. These materials do not establish a later recovery or a present outcome.
Scope and Method
Original laboratory reports, witness statements and investigative files were not inspected.
Prepared with AI assistance. Sources and references checked against the cited public materials. This paper is an original synthesis of the identified public sources; it does not reproduce article bodies, transcripts, or an investigative file.
Footnote References
- NamUs, MP1490; reviewed November 3, 2026.
- K8 Newsdesk, KAIT, Morgan Nick anniversary report, June 9, 2025.
- Arkansas House Resolution 1063, 2025 text, pp. 1–2.